The chart illustrates the significant impact of expense ratios on investment returns over a 30-year period, assuming a 6% annualized return. It highlights how even small differences in expense ratios can lead to substantial variations in portfolio value. For instance, a 1.0% expense ratio results in a portfolio value of $4,248 after 30 years, whereas a 2.5% expense ratio reduces the portfolio value to $2,687. This stark contrast underscores the importance of minimizing costs in long-term investment strategies. The compounding effect of returns is significantly hindered by higher costs, which can effectively halve the potential returns. This visualization serves as a powerful reminder for investors to carefully consider expense ratios when selecting investment vehicles, as these costs can erode the benefits of compounding over time.